Not sure where to start? Talk to our support team live.
Academic integrity
My Perfect Writing helps UK students understand assignment briefs, review their own drafts, decode tutor feedback, and check authenticity signals — without replacing the student’s own thinking or authorship.
We explain the task, not write the submission.
We review your draft, not replace your judgement.
We translate feedback, not hide weaknesses.
We flag authenticity risks, not help conceal misconduct.
Academic support should make the student’s own work clearer, stronger, and more responsible. Our tools are designed to guide decisions, not take those decisions away.
Brief Decoder
Brief Decoder helps students identify the command word, task focus, marking priorities, required evidence, and common risks before they begin drafting. It supports planning and understanding rather than producing the assignment.
Try Brief DecoderMarker’s Eye
Marker’s Eye reviews a student’s own draft against criteria such as critical analysis, structure, evidence use, referencing, and grade-band direction. It gives academic insight without replacing the student’s own argument or voice.
Explore Marker’s EyeFeedback Decoder
Feedback Decoder helps students understand comments such as “too descriptive,” “needs more evidence,” or “unclear argument.” It turns feedback into revision priorities so students can improve their next piece of work.
Try Feedback DecoderAI & Authenticity Check
The AI & Authenticity Check highlights possible AI-written, mixed, or manipulated writing patterns so students can review their work responsibly. It is not a promise of detection outcomes and must not be used to hide misconduct.
View sample reportsAI can support learning when it helps a student understand material, organise thinking, check clarity, or reflect on feedback. The risk begins when a tool replaces the student’s own analysis, argument, judgement, or authorship. University rules differ, so students should always check the assessment brief, module guidance, and institution policy before using AI for assessed work.
If your university or module gives specific AI rules, those rules come first.
A stronger assignment should show your reasoning, source evaluation, and academic position.
If your institution asks you to declare AI use, follow that guidance carefully.
This page is guidance, not legal or university policy advice. Students are responsible for following their own institution’s rules.
Academic-integrity rules are not identical across all universities, modules, or assessments. Some briefs may allow limited AI-assisted learning. Others may restrict or prohibit certain uses. My Perfect Writing is designed for learning support and academic review, but students should always follow the policy that applies to their own course and assessment.
Before using any support tool, check:
This page reflects common UK higher-education academic-integrity expectations, but your own university’s policy and assessment brief always come first.
Some students need more than an automated report. Human support can help explain feedback, clarify marking criteria, and make the next step easier to understand. The purpose is guidance: helping the student see what to improve, why it matters, and how to approach the revision responsibly.
A person walks through what the comment means and what a stronger response would look like.
Guidance is anchored to the marking criteria your work will actually be assessed against.
You leave with revision priorities you can act on yourself, in your own words.
No. My Perfect Writing provides structured reports and guidance to help students understand and improve their own work. It does not provide ready-made assignments or content intended for submission as someone else’s work.
You should always follow your university, module, and assessment rules first. My Perfect Writing is designed as learning support, but each student is responsible for checking what their institution allows and whether AI use must be declared.
A draft review tool is not automatically cheating. The key question is how it is used. Reviewing your own work, identifying weak areas, and making your own improvements is different from submitting work generated or completed by someone else.
Contract cheating usually means arranging for another person or service to complete academic work that a student then presents as their own. My Perfect Writing is built away from that model: it provides guidance, reports, and explanations rather than completed assignments.
Use the report as a learning signal. Revisit the paragraph, add judgement, explain why the evidence matters, compare viewpoints, and connect the point back to the question. The goal is to strengthen your own argument.
No. Authenticity checks provide signals and areas to review, not guarantees. The responsible use is to make sure the work reflects your own voice, understanding, evidence, and academic judgement before submission.
Start with your brief, draft, or feedback and receive a structured report that helps you understand the task, review your own work, and make responsible academic improvements.
Supporting students to understand, not outsource.
